All newspapers,
regardless of where they are published, have an ethnocentric viewpoint. That is because newspapers cater to their
readers and what they want to read, and readers most often wish to read about
what directly affects their own lives. …. Although the idea of ethnocentricity
might be natural, what ought to be questioned is the nature of the
ethnocentricity underlying the phenomenon.
In other words, what kinds of affiliations does the focus on us – on our
loyalties and interests in a particular place – reveal about ourselves, about
how and where we choose to place ourselves in the world?
Segall, A. and Schmidt,
S. Reading the Newspaper as a Social
Text. The Social Studies, May/June 2006.
Of all the things I did wrong (ok, could have done better) in my student
teaching/long-term sub placement, my biggest regret is not incorporating
current events and media more effectively in the AP Human Geography class. We did use current events and news stories in
class, of course. I regularly brought in
news articles that illustrated some concept we were studying – outsourcing,
genetically modified foods, migration, suburbanization, deindustrialization –
and had the students identify and apply the geographic concepts. Sometimes we pushed further and had excellent
critical or evaluative discussions about the topic. But while I was using media in the classroom, I wasn’t teaching media in the classroom, which is the focus of Segall and
Schmidt’s excellent article.
Most of our Methods class discussion on this articled
centered on the authors’ main point, that newspapers (and other media, by
extension) are social constructs that present someone else’s choices about who
and what is “news.” The danger for
readers lies in accepting these choices as objective truth, not subjective
choice. The task for readers (and for
us, as teachers) is to challenge those choices and the reasons behind them, and
to ask, whose voices and stories aren’t we hearing and why?
But as I was re-reading the article this week, as well as
focusing more on the Geography class that I am still teaching, I was intrigued
by the spatial aspect of their argument.
Geographers have terms and models that explain the natural ethnocentrism
that the authors refer to: the gravity
model posits that the larger and closer something is to us, the greater its
pull and attraction on our attention and actions; the idea of distance decay
says that the farther away we are from something, the less we care about it and
the less we are affected by it. (Human
Geography is not rocket science.) But geography
can’t answer the second part of the question – what does this say about how we
place ourselves in the world? How does
that ethnocentrism translate into how we spend our time, energy, and resources?
Who we value and who we do not? Should
we try to fight against distance decay and care more about far-away places, and
if so, what criteria should we use to replace distance and familiarity? Can we care about everything?
Lots of questions here, and unfortunately, I asked my
students to contemplate very few of them this semester. In the spirit of reflection and improvement,
however, I did find a great and engaging tool to begin the exploration that
could inform some of those conversations.
The site is called Newsmap, out of Palo Alto CA (and my AP HUG class
could, in fact, explain why so many high-tech firms are located there). The link is http://newsmap.jp/
From the Newsmap site:
Newsmap is an application that visually
reflects the constantly changing landscape of the Google News news aggregator.
A treemap visualization algorithm
helps display the enormous amount of information gathered by the aggregator.
Treemaps are traditionally space-constrained visualizations of information.
Newsmap's objective takes that goal a step further and provides a tool to
divide information into quickly recognizable bands which, when presented
together, reveal underlying patterns in news reporting across cultures and
within news segments in constant change around the globe.
Newsmap's objective is to simply
demonstrate visually the relationships between data and the unseen patterns in
news media.
Google News automatically groups
news tories with similar content and places them based on algorithmic results
into clusters. In Newsmap, the size of each cell is determined by the amount of
related articles that exist inside each news cluster that the Google News
Aggregator presents. In that way users can quickly identify which news stories
have been given the most coverage, viewing the map by region, topic or time.
Through that process it still accentuates the importance of a given article.
Newsmap also allows to compare the
news landscape among several countries, making it possible to differentiate
which countries give more coverage to, for example, more national news than
international or sports rather than business.
Sarah,
ReplyDeleteInteresting tool -- I spent some time tooling around Newsmap after reading your post. It was interesting to refresh the page every few minutes to see how things had changed.
Those questions you posed at the end of the third paragraph are very interesting and important -- hopefully you can find even more time to raise these with students in the future, although I am sure you did a better job raising these questions than you give yourself credit for.